Market Breadth Data******************************

Thursday, November 05, 2026

What the Record Says About Days Like This

SPY fell 4.4% today and the VIX jumped to 28.2. In tests back to 1990, a VIX above 20 is when all four CIT dip buys did their best: about twice the edge per trade of calm days.


Today

MarketCloseToday
S&P 500 (SPY)733.00-4.4%
Nasdaq 100 (QQQ)647.05-6.5%
Russell 2000 (IWM)270.98-4.6%
Dow (DIA)514.27-3.5%
VIX28.18+69.7%

SPY closed above its 200-day average (727), 0.8% over it. That matters in the next table, and it is a thin margin: another day like today would put SPY in the weaker row.

After days like this

Every day since 1993 that SPY fell 3% or more with the VIX above 20, counted once per sell-off (the first day, then nothing for a month), and SPY's gain after it:

Sell-offs1 week1 month3 months
All
(43)
+0.62%
56% up
+1.29%
63% up
+4.93%
77% up
SPY above
200-day (16)
+1.99%
81% up
+1.79%
75% up
+6.03%
88% up
SPY below
200-day (31)
-0.11%
45% up
+0.56%
55% up
+4.30%
71% up
Any day,
for scale
+0.23%
59% up
+0.96%
66% up
+2.89%
72% up

Each cell is SPY's average gain and how often it was higher. The worst 3 months after one of these days: -7.8% when SPY was above its 200-day, -29.2% when it was below.

Sixteen is a small sample, and it holds the worst case too: on February 24, 2020, SPY was also above its 200-day, and a month later it was 24% lower. Below the 200-day, the first two weeks were usually worse before they were better.

Why the VIX matters for the dip buys

The four CIT dip buys buy short, sharp drops and sell on the first strong close, usually within 3 to 5 days. Split by the VIX on the day of the signal, every one of them did better when fear was high. Edge is the trade's gain minus the average of 50 random entries in the same stock held just as long, so it is what the signal added beyond being in the stock.

Edge per trade, 2005 to 2026: Dow 30 stocks, IWM, GLD, TLT

RuleVIX 20 or lessVIX above 20VIX above 25
QS RSI+0.25+0.83+1.37
CIT MACD Dip+0.18+0.98+1.39
CIT ComboRSI Dip+0.18+0.74+1.26
CIT RSI+VWAP Dip+0.09+0.45+0.76

Edge per trade, 2005 to 2026: SPY, QQQ, S&P 500, Nasdaq 100

RuleVIX 20 or lessVIX above 20VIX above 25
QS RSI+0.39+1.01+1.28
CIT MACD Dip+0.62+1.29+1.70
CIT ComboRSI Dip+0.25+0.78+1.25
CIT RSI+VWAP Dip+0.43+0.73+0.98

The same test on 1990 to 2004, an earlier stretch of data, came out the same way: all 8 rule and market pairs had more edge with the VIX above 20 (stocks +0.30 to +0.50 points on calm days, +0.64 to +0.94 above 20). Winners ran roughly 70% for stocks and 70 to 85% for the indexes in every bucket; what changes is how much the winners make.

The price: bigger losers. With the VIX above 20 the worst QS RSI stock trade was -38.9%, against -18.9% on calm days. The rules have no stop; they wait for the bounce, up to 60 days.

The CIT Pullback


The slower cousin: a close above the 200-day average and below the prior 7-day low, after a down run that has lasted longer than usual (the CIT Swing Count at or past its 1σ length). It sells on a close above the 5-day average. Edge per trade on the Dow 30 and the index funds: +0.51 points in 2005 to 2026 and +1.20 with the VIX above 20; +1.05 and +1.24 in 1990 to 2004. It is on the AI page in OT Trend.


The last three months

The other side of the same table: over the last three months the live record of the four rules was 3,705 trades, 57% winners, 0.53 points a trade behind random days. The VIX averaged 16 and closed above 20 on two days. That is the calm-market column, and it is why a quiet market is not the time to judge a dip buy.

Today's list

At today's close 118 of the 509 stocks and funds scanned had at least one dip buy fire (the number in brackets is how many of the four): MPC (4), P (4), PLTR (4), PSX (4), ADI (3), APA (3), CMI (3), COP (3), CVX (3), DELL (3), DOW (3), EOG (3), EXE (3), EXPD (3), GD (3), IEX (3), ILMN (3), INTC (3), KMI (3), LITE (3), LMT (3), LYB (3), MRVL (3), MU (3), NDSN (3), NUE (3), OKE (3), OXY (3), PANW (3), SLB (3), STLD (3), TDY (3), TEL (3), TRGP (3), TSLA (3), TXN (3), URI (3), VLO (3), XOM (3), AEP (2) and 78 more. Among the funds: QQQ, IWM, SPY.

61 earlier trades are still open. The list, with each one's exit level, updates after every close in the CIT Dip Buys watchlist in OddsTrader. A signal is a rule firing, not a recommendation.

Exits: the next open after a close above the prior day's high (the CIT MACD Dip sells at that close); the CIT RSI+VWAP Dip sells the next open after RSI(3) closes above 55. 60 days at most.

How the tests were run: daily bars, fills as stated, no commissions or slippage; the sell-off table uses SPY with dividends. Past results don't promise future ones, and this is not investment advice.


Wednesday, November 04, 2026

Wall Street’s Relief Rally Has a Catch

 

MARKET CLOSE · NOVEMBER 4, 2026

The Dow surged, oil tumbled, and leadership shifted. Now comes the test: can the S&P 500 hold 7,600?

November 4, 2026 · Markets & policy

Wednesday’s market story was not simply that stocks went up. It was that investors changed what they wanted to own.

An overnight decline in futures gave way to a sharp rally as a Democratic victory in both chambers of Congress became clear. The Dow climbed 3.03% to 53,356.12, while the S&P 500 advanced 1.58% to 7,688.62 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 1.44% to 25,736.51.

But those headline gains conceal the more interesting development: a rotation toward Dow constituents and rate-sensitive sectors, even as some semiconductor, AI, energy, and defense stocks retreated. This was a policy-expectations rally—not an indiscriminate vote of confidence in every corner of the market.

Oil Was the Other Big Story

Investors anticipated challenges to tariff policy and pressure to end the Iran war. Those expectations—not enacted changes—helped reshape the outlook for inflation and geopolitical risk.

WTI finished at $88.55, down 7.85%. Brent fell roughly 8% or more, although reported final prices differed. Treasury yields also declined, with the 10-year around 4.89%, while the dollar softened. Gold gained roughly 3.4%, and the VIX ended at 16.69.

The oil move stood out because it ran against the inventory signal: US crude stocks fell when a build had been expected. The session suggested political and geopolitical repricing outweighed the weekly supply data.

A Rally With Winners—and Exceptions

Reported closing sector figures showed real estate gaining 3.96% while energy lost 3.96%. The contrast captures the day’s split: lower yields supported one group while falling oil pressured another.

The same divide appeared among individual stocks. 3M rose more than 9%, and McDonald’s gained 6.53% following better-than-expected quarterly results. Yet Nvidia fell about 3%, Broadcom about 2%, and CoreWeave about 10%. Defense names also retreated.

That uneven participation matters. A stronger Dow alongside weaker chip and AI names suggests investors were reassessing policy exposure rather than merely adding risk across the board. The Nasdaq’s gain did not erase the weakness beneath its headline.

The Economic Backdrop Was Mixed

Politics dominated the session, but the data still offered a useful counterweight to the enthusiasm. ADP reported 86,000 private-sector jobs in October, above the roughly 69,000 consensus. ISM services came in at 54.5, slightly below expectations, while its prices-paid measure remained elevated at 73.0.

The result was not a clean all-clear on inflation or growth. Firmer labor signals appeared alongside softer services activity and still-high price pressures. Falling oil improved the market’s inflation narrative; it did not settle the broader economic debate.

Why 7,600 Is the Level to Watch

The S&P 500’s recovery above 7,600 is the central technical development. The Gann, Elliott Wave, and Hurst interpretations outlined here all became more constructive after Wednesday’s close—but all remained conditional on the index holding that level through Friday’s jobs report.

In plain English: the rebound improved the setup, but one strong session did not establish a durable trend. The next resistance area is 7,700–7,740. A close back below 7,600 would weaken the recovery case, with Tuesday’s 7,568.92 close another reference point below it. These are interpretive scenarios, not forecasts.

 

One day reclaimed the levels; it did not yet confirm the trend.

 

What Comes Next

Thursday, November 5, sets up as a potential digestion day before Friday’s employment report. The near-term watchlist centers on three questions:

·        Does the easing narrative hold? The Bank of England decision is scheduled for 4:00 a.m. Pacific, with a cut to 3.75% from 4.00% expected.

·        Does the labor picture change? Initial jobless claims arrive at 5:30 a.m. Pacific, with roughly 197,000 expected versus 194,000 previously.

·        Do costs reinforce the inflation relief? Preliminary third-quarter productivity and unit labor costs also arrive at 5:30 a.m. Pacific. Expectations are for 2.9% productivity growth and roughly 0.7% growth in unit labor costs.

Friday’s jobs report on November 6 is the next major checkpoint, followed by the CPI release listed for November 10. For the technical recovery described here, the immediate question remains whether 7,600 holds as those events approach.

The Bottom Line

Wednesday delivered a powerful relief rally, but the most revealing signal was its selectivity. Oil, yields, and sector leadership moved together as investors repriced policy expectations. The next test is whether those expectations survive fresh economic data—and whether the S&P 500 can defend its reclaimed support.


Relief lifts the tide
Old leaders find their footing
Will the shoreline hold?


 


Terms of Use

All rights reserved by the author. The material contained herein is original content and is the sole property of the author. Any commercial use or reproduction - either in part or whole - is strictly forbidden without the author's prior consent.

Disclaimer: The information provided here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute trading advice nor an invitation to buy or sell securities. The views are the personal views of the author. Before acting on any of the ideas expressed, the reader should seek professional advice to determine the suitability in view of his or her personal circumstances.